# Robot Agent - Implementation TODO > Based on DESIGN.md and TECHNICAL.md > Test environment: `source yao/env.local.sh` > Test assistants: `yao-dev-app/assistants/robot/` --- ## Workflow: Human-AI Collaboration **Important:** Follow this workflow strictly for each sub-task. ``` ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Implementation Workflow │ ├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ 1. AI: Implement code for current sub-task │ │ 2. AI: Present code for review (DO NOT write tests yet) │ │ 3. Human: Review code, provide feedback │ │ 4. AI: Iterate based on feedback │ │ 5. Human: Confirm "LGTM" or "Approved" │ │ 6. AI: Write tests for the approved code │ │ 7. Human: Review tests │ │ 8. AI: Run tests, fix if needed │ │ 9. Human: Confirm sub-task complete, move to next │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ ``` **Rules:** | Rule | Description | | ------------------------ | ------------------------------------------ | | One sub-task at a time | Focus only on current sub-task | | No tests before approval | Wait for human "LGTM" before writing tests | | No jumping ahead | Do not implement future phases | | Ask if unclear | When in doubt, ask before proceeding | --- ## Core Principle - Phase 1-2: Types + Skeleton (code compiles) - Phase 3: Complete scheduling system (Cache + Pool + Trigger + Dedup + Job), executor is stub - Phase 4-9: Implement executor phases one by one (P0 → P5) - Phase 10: API completion, end-to-end tests - Monitoring: Provided by Job system, no separate implementation --- ## Phase 1: Types & Interfaces ✅ **Goal:** Define all types, enums, interfaces. No logic, no external deps. **Status:** Complete - 88.4% test coverage, all tests passing ### 1.1 Enums (`types/enums.go`) - [x] `Phase` - execution phases (inspiration, goals, tasks, run, delivery, learning) - [x] `ClockMode` - clock trigger modes (times, interval, daemon) - [x] `TriggerType` - trigger sources (clock, human, event) - [x] `ExecStatus` - execution status (pending, running, completed, failed, cancelled) - [x] `RobotStatus` - robot status (idle, working, paused, error, maintenance) - [x] `InterventionAction` - human actions (task.add, goal.adjust, etc.) - [x] `Priority` - priority levels (high, normal, low) - [x] `DeliveryType` - delivery types (email, file, webhook, notify) - [x] `DedupResult` - dedup results (skip, merge, proceed) - [x] `EventSource` - event sources (webhook, database) - [x] `LearningType` - learning types (execution, feedback, insight) - [x] `TaskSource` - task sources (auto, human, event) - [x] `ExecutorType` - executor types (assistant, mcp, process) - [x] `TaskStatus` - task status (pending, running, completed, failed, skipped, cancelled) - [x] `InsertPosition` - insert positions (first, last, next, at) ### 1.2 Context (`types/context.go`) - [x] `Context` struct - robot execution context - [x] `NewContext()` - constructor - [x] `UserID()`, `TeamID()` - helper methods ### 1.3 Config Types (`types/config.go`) - [x] `Config` - main config struct - [x] `Triggers`, `TriggerSwitch` - trigger enable/disable - [x] `Clock` - clock config with validation - [x] `Identity` - role, duties, rules - [x] `Quota` - concurrency limits with defaults - [x] `KB`, `DB` - knowledge base and database config - [x] `Learn` - learning config - [x] `Resources`, `MCPConfig` - available agents and tools - [x] `Delivery` - output delivery config - [x] `Event` - event trigger config ### 1.4 Core Types (`types/robot.go`) - [x] `Robot` struct - runtime robot representation - [x] `Robot` methods - `CanRun()`, `RunningCount()`, `AddExecution()`, `RemoveExecution()`, `GetExecution()`, `GetExecutions()` - [x] `Execution` struct - single execution instance - [x] `TriggerInput` - stored trigger input - [x] `CurrentState` - current executing state - [x] `Goals` - P1 output (markdown) - [x] `Task` - planned task (structured) - [x] `TaskResult` - task execution result - [x] `DeliveryResult` - delivery output - [x] `LearningEntry` - knowledge to save ### 1.5 Clock Context (`types/clock.go`) - [x] `ClockContext` struct - time context for P0 - [x] `NewClockContext()` - constructor ### 1.6 Inspiration (`types/inspiration.go`) - [x] `InspirationReport` struct - P0 output ### 1.7 Request/Response (`types/request.go`) - [x] `InterveneRequest` - human intervention request - [x] `EventRequest` - event trigger request - [x] `ExecutionResult` - trigger result - [x] `RobotState` - robot status query result ### 1.8 Interfaces (`types/interfaces.go`) - [x] `Manager` interface - [x] `Executor` interface - [x] `Pool` interface - [x] `Cache` interface - [x] `Dedup` interface - [x] `Store` interface ### 1.9 Errors (`types/errors.go`) - [x] Config errors - [x] Runtime errors - [x] Phase errors ### 1.10 Tests - [x] `types/enums_test.go` - enum validation - [x] `types/config_test.go` - config validation - [x] `types/clock_test.go` - clock context creation - [x] `types/robot_test.go` - robot methods --- ## Phase 2: Skeleton Implementation ✅ **Goal:** Create all packages with empty/stub implementations. Code compiles. **Status:** Complete - All packages compile successfully, no circular dependencies ### 2.1 Utils (`utils/`) ✅ - [x] `utils/convert.go` - JSON, map, struct conversions (implement) - [x] `utils/time.go` - time parsing, formatting, timezone (implement) - [x] `utils/id.go` - ID generation (nanoid) (implement) - [x] `utils/validate.go` - validation helpers (implement) - [x] Test: `utils/utils_test.go` ### 2.2 Package Skeletons ✅ (stubs only, implemented in Phase 3) Create empty structs and stub methods that return nil/empty/success: - [x] `cache/cache.go` - Cache struct, stub methods - [x] `dedup/dedup.go` - Dedup struct, stub methods - [x] `store/store.go` - Store struct, stub methods - [x] `pool/pool.go` - Pool struct, stub methods - [x] `job/job.go` - job helper stubs - [x] `plan/plan.go` - Plan struct, stub methods - [x] `trigger/trigger.go` - trigger dispatcher stub - [x] `executor/executor.go` - Executor struct, stub `Execute()` - [x] `manager/manager.go` - Manager struct, stub methods ### 2.3 API Skeletons ✅ - [x] `api/api.go` - Go API facade (all function signatures, return errors) - [x] `api/process.go` - Yao Process registration (all processes, return errors) - [x] `api/jsapi.go` - JSAPI registration (all methods, return errors) ### 2.4 Root ✅ - [x] `robot.go` - package entry - [x] `Init()` - placeholder - [x] `Shutdown()` - placeholder ### 2.5 Compile Test ✅ - [x] All packages compile without errors - [x] All imports resolve correctly - [x] No circular dependencies --- ## Phase 3: Complete Scheduling System ✅ **Goal:** Implement complete scheduling system. Executor is stub (simulates success). **Status:** Complete - All 7 sub-tasks done, 80+ integration tests passing This phase delivers a fully working scheduling pipeline: ``` Trigger → Manager → Cache → Dedup → Pool → Worker → Executor(stub) → Job ``` ### ✅ 3.1 Cache Implementation (COMPLETE) - [x] `cache/cache.go` - Cache struct with thread-safe map - [x] `cache/load.go` - load robots from `__yao.member` where `member_type='robot'` and `autonomous_mode=true` - [x] Implemented pagination (100 robots per page) - [x] Configurable model name via `SetMemberModel()` - [x] `cache/refresh.go` - refresh single robot, periodic full refresh (every hour) - [x] Test: load/refresh with real DB - [x] Created comprehensive integration tests with real database - [x] Tests cover Load, LoadByID, Refresh, ListByTeam, GetByStatus - [x] All tests passing with proper cleanup ### ✅ 3.2 Pool Implementation (COMPLETE) - [x] `pool/pool.go` - worker pool with configurable size (global limit) - [x] Default config: 10 workers, 100 queue size - [x] Configurable via `pool.NewWithConfig()` - [x] `pool/queue.go` - priority queue (sorted by: robot priority, trigger type, wait time) - [x] Two-level limit: global queue + per-robot queue - [x] Priority: Robot Priority × 1000 + Trigger Priority × 100 - [x] `pool/worker.go` - worker goroutines, dispatch to executor - [x] Non-blocking quota check with re-enqueue - [x] Graceful shutdown support - [x] Test: submit jobs, verify execution order, verify concurrency limits - [x] 15 test cases covering all edge cases - [x] All tests passing ### ✅ 3.3 Manager Implementation (COMPLETE) > **Note:** Manager is the scheduling core, depends on completed Cache and Pool. - [x] `manager/manager.go` - Manager struct - [x] `Start()` - load cache, start pool, start ticker goroutine - [x] `Stop()` - graceful shutdown (wait for running, drain queue) - [x] `Tick()` - main loop: 1. Get all cached robots 2. For each robot with clock trigger enabled 3. Check if should execute (times/interval/daemon modes) 4. Submit to pool - [x] `TriggerManual()` - manual trigger for testing/API - [x] Clock modes: times, interval, daemon - [x] Day matching for times mode - [x] Timezone handling - [x] Skip paused/error/maintenance robots - [x] Test: manager start/stop, tick cycle, manual trigger, clock modes, goroutine leak ### ✅ 3.4 Trigger Implementation (COMPLETE) - [x] `trigger/trigger.go` - validation and helper functions - [x] `ValidateIntervention()` - validate human intervention requests - [x] `ValidateEvent()` - validate event trigger requests - [x] `BuildEventInput()` - build TriggerInput from event request - [x] `GetActionCategory()` / `GetActionDescription()` - action helpers - [x] `trigger/clock.go` - ClockMatcher for clock trigger matching - [x] `times` mode: match specific times (09:00, 14:00) - [x] `interval` mode: run every X duration (30m, 1h) - [x] `daemon` mode: restart immediately after completion - [x] Timezone handling - [x] Day-of-week filtering - [x] `trigger/control.go` - ExecutionController for pause/resume/stop - [x] Track/Untrack executions - [x] Pause/Resume execution - [x] Stop execution (cancel context) - [x] WaitIfPaused() for executor integration - [x] `manager/manager.go` - integrated trigger handling - [x] `Intervene()` - human intervention handler - [x] `HandleEvent()` - event trigger handler - [x] `PauseExecution()` / `ResumeExecution()` / `StopExecution()` - [x] `ListExecutions()` / `ListExecutionsByMember()` - [x] Tests: `trigger/trigger_test.go`, `trigger/clock_test.go`, `trigger/control_test.go` - [x] Validation tests for intervention and event requests - [x] Clock matching tests for all modes - [x] ExecutionController lifecycle tests - [x] Manager integration tests for Intervene/HandleEvent ### ✅ 3.5 Job Integration (COMPLETE) - [x] `job/job.go` - create job - [x] `job_id`: `robot_exec_{execID}` - [x] `category_name`: `Autonomous Robot` / `自主机器人` (localized) - [x] Metadata: member_id, team_id, trigger_type, exec_id, display_name - [x] `Options` struct for extensibility (Priority, MaxRetryCount, DefaultTimeout, Metadata) - [x] `Create()`, `Get()`, `Update()`, `Complete()`, `Fail()`, `Cancel()` - [x] Status mapping: ExecPending→queued, ExecRunning→running, etc. - [x] Localization support (en-US, zh-CN) - [x] `job/execution.go` - execution lifecycle - [x] `CreateOptions` struct for extensibility - [x] `CreateExecution()` - create both robot Execution and job.Execution - [x] `UpdatePhase()` - update phase with progress tracking (10%→25%→40%→60%→80%→95%) - [x] `UpdateStatus()` - update execution status - [x] `CompleteExecution()` / `FailExecution()` / `CancelExecution()` - [x] TriggerType → TriggerCategory mapping (clock→scheduled, human→manual, event→event) - [x] Duration calculation on completion/failure/cancellation - [x] `job/log.go` - write phase logs - [x] `Log()` - base log function with context - [x] `LogPhaseStart()` / `LogPhaseEnd()` / `LogPhaseError()` - [x] `LogError()` / `LogInfo()` / `LogDebug()` / `LogWarn()` - [x] `LogTaskStart()` / `LogTaskEnd()` - [x] `LogDelivery()` / `LogLearning()` - [x] Localization support for all log messages - [x] Test: job creation, execution tracking, log writing - [x] `job/job_test.go` - 17 test cases - [x] `job/execution_test.go` - 26 test cases - [x] `job/log_test.go` - 24 test cases - [x] All tests passing with real database ### ✅ 3.6 Executor Architecture (COMPLETE) Pluggable executor architecture with multiple execution modes: ``` executor/ ├── types/ │ ├── types.go # Executor interface, Config types │ └── helpers.go # Shared helper functions ├── standard/ │ ├── executor.go # Real Agent execution (production) │ ├── agent.go # AgentCaller for LLM calls │ ├── input.go # InputFormatter for prompts │ ├── inspiration.go # P0: Inspiration phase │ ├── goals.go # P1: Goals phase │ ├── tasks.go # P2: Tasks phase │ ├── run.go # P3: Run phase │ ├── delivery.go # P4: Delivery phase │ └── learning.go # P5: Learning phase ├── dryrun/ │ └── executor.go # Simulated execution (testing/demo) ├── sandbox/ │ └── executor.go # Container-isolated (NOT IMPLEMENTED) └── executor.go # Factory functions ``` **Execution Modes:** | Mode | Use Case | Status | | -------- | -------------------------------- | ------------------ | | Standard | Production with real Agent calls | ✅ Implemented | | DryRun | Tests, demos, scheduling tests | ✅ Implemented | | Sandbox | Container-isolated execution | ⬜ Not Implemented | > **⚠️ Sandbox Mode:** Requires container-level isolation (Docker/gVisor/Firecracker) > for true security. Current placeholder behaves like DryRun. Future feature. - [x] `executor/types/types.go` - `Executor` interface, `PhaseExecutor` interface - [x] `executor/types/helpers.go` - `BuildTriggerInput()` shared helper - [x] `executor/executor.go` - Factory functions (`New`, `NewDryRun`, `NewWithMode`) - [x] `executor/standard/executor.go` - Real execution with Job integration - [x] `executor/standard/phases.go` - Phase implementations (P0-P5) - [x] `executor/dryrun/executor.go` - Simulated execution with callbacks - [x] `executor/sandbox/executor.go` - Placeholder (NOT IMPLEMENTED) - [x] Manager integration - accepts `Executor` interface via config - [x] Tests use DryRun mode for scheduling/concurrency tests ### 3.7 Integration Test (End-to-End Scheduling) ✅ - [x] Create test robot in `__yao.member` with clock config - [x] Start manager - [x] Wait for clock trigger - [x] Verify: - [x] Robot loaded to cache - [x] Clock trigger matched - [x] Job submitted to pool - [x] Worker picked up job - [x] Executor stub called - [x] Job execution recorded - [x] Logs written - [x] Test human intervention trigger - [x] Test event trigger - [x] Test concurrent executions (multiple robots) - [x] Test quota enforcement (per-robot limit) - [x] Test pause/resume/stop **Test Files Created:** - `manager/integration_test.go` - Core scheduling flow (Cache→Pool→Executor) - `manager/integration_clock_test.go` - Clock trigger modes (times/interval/daemon) - `manager/integration_human_test.go` - Human intervention trigger tests - `manager/integration_event_test.go` - Event trigger tests - `manager/integration_concurrent_test.go` - Concurrent execution & quota tests - `manager/integration_control_test.go` - Pause/Resume/Stop tests **Test Coverage:** - 27 top-level test functions - 80+ sub-tests covering all verification points - 3x run stability verified --- ## Phase 4: Agent Call Infrastructure ✅ **Goal:** Implement unified Agent/Assistant calling mechanism. This is the foundation for all phase implementations (P0-P5). **Architecture Note:** - **Prompt construction is handled by Assistant layer** (`prompts.yml` in each assistant) - **Executor only prepares input data** (ClockContext, InspirationReport, etc.) and calls Assistant - **Assistant framework handles** prompt rendering, LLM API calls, streaming **Implemented:** 1. A unified way to call assistants with streaming support 2. Input data formatting for each phase 3. Response parsing (markdown and structured data via `gou/text`) 4. Multi-turn conversation support ### 4.1 Agent Caller Implementation ✅ - [x] `executor/agent.go` - `AgentCaller` struct with `SkipOutput`, `SkipHistory`, `SkipSearch`, `ChatID` - [x] `executor/agent.go` - `Call(ctx, assistantID, messages)` - basic call with full response - [x] `executor/agent.go` - `CallWithMessages(ctx, assistantID, userContent)` - convenience method - [x] `executor/agent.go` - `CallWithSystemAndUser(ctx, assistantID, systemContent, userContent)` - [x] `executor/agent.go` - handle assistant not found error - [x] `executor/agent.go` - handle LLM API errors gracefully - [x] `executor/agent.go` - `CallResult.GetJSON()` / `GetJSONArray()` - parse JSON response using `gou/text` - [x] `executor/agent.go` - `Conversation` struct for multi-turn dialogues - [x] `executor/agent.go` - `Conversation.Turn()`, `RunUntil()`, `Reset()`, `WithSystemPrompt()` - [x] `executor/agent.go` - Use `agentcontext.Noop()` logger to suppress debug output ### 4.2 Input Formatters ✅ - [x] `executor/input.go` - `FormatClockContext(clockCtx, robot)` - format clock context as message content - [x] `executor/input.go` - `FormatInspirationReport(report)` - format P0 output for P1 input - [x] `executor/input.go` - `FormatTriggerInput(input)` - format Human/Event trigger for P1 input - [x] `executor/input.go` - `FormatGoals(goals, robot)` - format P1 output for P2 input - [x] `executor/input.go` - `FormatTasks(tasks)` - format P2 output for P3 input - [x] `executor/input.go` - `FormatTaskResults(results)` - format P3 output for P4/P5 input - [x] `executor/input.go` - `FormatExecutionSummary(exec)` - format full execution for P5 input - [x] `executor/input.go` - `BuildMessages()`, `BuildMessagesWithSystem()` - helper methods ### 4.3 Test Assistants ✅ - [x] `yao-dev-app/assistants/tests/robot-single/` - Single-turn test assistant - [x] `yao-dev-app/assistants/tests/robot-conversation/` - Multi-turn conversation test assistant ### 4.4 Tests ✅ - [x] `executor/agent_test.go` - 22 test cases for AgentCaller and Conversation - [x] `executor/input_test.go` - 20 test cases for InputFormatter - [x] Verify: assistant can be called and returns response - [x] Verify: multi-turn conversation maintains state - [x] Verify: input data is well-formatted for assistant prompts - [x] Verify: JSON/YAML extraction from LLM output works correctly --- ## Phase 5: Test Scenario & Assistants Setup ✅ **Goal:** Create realistic test scenarios with all required assistants. **Architecture:** ``` ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ 6 Generic Phase Agents (P0-P5) │ ├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ inspiration │ goals │ tasks │ validation │ delivery │ learning │ │ (P0) │ (P1) │ (P2) │ (P3) │ (P4) │ (P5) │ └───────────────┴─────────┴─────────┴──────────────┴────────────┴─────────────┘ ↓ P2 assigns tasks to ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Expert Agents (Task Executors) │ ├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ text-writer │ web-reader │ data-analyst │ summarizer │ ... │ │ (Generate) │ (Fetch URL) │ (Analyze) │ (Summarize) │ │ └───────────────┴──────────────┴────────────────┴──────────────┴─────────────┘ ``` **Test Strategy:** - Phase Agents (P0-P5) are **generic** and reusable across all robot types - Expert Agents are **specialized** for specific tasks (text, web, data, etc.) - Each P0-P5 test uses **different expert combinations** to cover real scenarios - Tests use `interval: 1s` or `TriggerManual()` for easy triggering (no time dependency) ### 5.1 Directory Structure ``` yao-dev-app/assistants/ ├── robot/ # Generic Phase Agents │ ├── inspiration/ # P0: Analyze clock context, generate insights │ │ ├── package.yao │ │ └── prompts.yml │ ├── goals/ # P1: Generate prioritized goals │ │ ├── package.yao │ │ └── prompts.yml │ ├── tasks/ # P2: Split goals into executable tasks │ │ ├── package.yao │ │ └── prompts.yml │ ├── validation/ # P3: Validate task results │ │ ├── package.yao │ │ └── prompts.yml │ ├── delivery/ # P4: Format and deliver results │ │ ├── package.yao │ │ └── prompts.yml │ └── learning/ # P5: Summarize execution, extract insights │ ├── package.yao │ └── prompts.yml │ └── experts/ # Expert Agents (Task Executors) ├── text-writer/ # Generate text content (reports, emails, summaries) │ ├── package.yao │ └── prompts.yml ├── web-reader/ # Fetch and parse web page content │ ├── package.yao │ └── prompts.yml ├── data-analyst/ # Analyze data, generate insights │ ├── package.yao │ └── prompts.yml └── summarizer/ # Summarize long text into key points ├── package.yao └── prompts.yml ``` ### 5.2 Generic Phase Agents #### 5.2.1 Inspiration Agent (P0) - [x] `robot/inspiration/package.yao` - config with model, temperature - [x] `robot/inspiration/prompts.yml` - system prompt: - Input: Clock context (time, day, markers), robot identity - Output: Markdown report with Summary, Highlights, Opportunities, Risks - Style: Analytical, context-aware #### 5.2.2 Goals Agent (P1) - [x] `robot/goals/package.yao` - config - [x] `robot/goals/prompts.yml` - system prompt: - Input: Inspiration report OR trigger input (human/event) - Output: Prioritized goals in markdown (High/Normal/Low) - Style: Strategic, actionable #### 5.2.3 Tasks Agent (P2) - [x] `robot/tasks/package.yao` - config - [x] `robot/tasks/prompts.yml` - system prompt: - Input: Goals, available expert agents list - Output: Structured task list (JSON) with executor assignments - Style: Detailed, executable #### 5.2.4 Validation Agent (P3) - [x] `robot/validation/package.yao` - config - [x] `robot/validation/prompts.yml` - system prompt: - Input: Task result, expected outcome - Output: Validation result (pass/fail, issues, suggestions) - Style: Critical, thorough #### 5.2.5 Delivery Agent (P4) - [x] `robot/delivery/package.yao` - config - [x] `robot/delivery/prompts.yml` - system prompt: - Input: Task results, delivery target (email, report, notification) - Output: Formatted delivery content - Style: Clear, professional #### 5.2.6 Learning Agent (P5) - [x] `robot/learning/package.yao` - config - [x] `robot/learning/prompts.yml` - system prompt: - Input: Full execution summary - Output: Insights, patterns, improvement suggestions - Style: Reflective, insightful ### 5.3 Expert Agents (Task Executors) #### 5.3.1 Text Writer - [x] `experts/text-writer/package.yao` - config - [x] `experts/text-writer/prompts.yml` - system prompt: - Input: Topic, key points, style (formal/casual), length - Output: Generated text content - Use cases: Weekly reports, email drafts, summaries #### 5.3.2 Web Reader - [x] `experts/web-reader/package.yao` - config with hooks - [x] `experts/web-reader/prompts.yml` - system prompt: - Input: URL or topic to search - Output: Extracted content, key information - Use cases: News fetching, competitor monitoring, research - [x] `experts/web-reader/src/fetch.ts` - HTTP fetching utilities - [x] `experts/web-reader/src/fetch_test.ts` - 19 test cases (100% pass) - [x] `experts/web-reader/src/index.ts` - Create/Next hooks #### 5.3.3 Data Analyst - [x] `experts/data-analyst/package.yao` - config - [x] `experts/data-analyst/prompts.yml` - system prompt: - Input: Data description, analysis goal - Output: Analysis report, trends, insights - Use cases: Sales analysis, performance review #### 5.3.4 Summarizer - [x] `experts/summarizer/package.yao` - config - [x] `experts/summarizer/prompts.yml` - system prompt: - Input: Long text content - Output: Concise summary with key points - Use cases: Document summarization, meeting notes ### 5.4 Test Scenarios Each phase test uses different expert combinations: | Test | Phase | Trigger | Expert Agents Used | Verification | | ---- | ----- | ---------------- | ------------------------ | ----------------------------- | | T1 | P0 | Clock (interval) | - | Clock → Inspiration report | | T2 | P1 | Clock | - | Inspiration → Goals | | T3 | P1 | Human | - | User input → Goals | | T4 | P2 | Clock | text-writer, web-reader | Goals → Tasks with executors | | T5 | P3 | Clock | text-writer | Task exec → Result validation | | T6 | P3 | Human | summarizer | Task exec → Result validation | | T7 | P4 | Clock | - | Results → Delivery format | | T8 | P5 | Clock | - | Full execution → Insights | | T9 | E2E | Clock | text-writer, summarizer | Full P0→P5 flow | | T10 | E2E | Human | web-reader, data-analyst | Full P1→P5 flow | ### 5.5 Verification - [x] All 6 Phase Agents load correctly (`robot.inspiration`, `robot.goals`, etc.) - [x] All 4 Expert Agents load correctly (`experts.text-writer`, `experts.web-reader`, etc.) - [x] Web Reader `fetch.ts` utilities tested (19 tests, 100% pass) --- ## Phase 6: P0 Inspiration Implementation ✅ **Goal:** Implement P0 (Inspiration Agent). Clock trigger → P0 → stub P1-P5. **Depends on:** Phase 4 (Agent Call Infrastructure), Phase 5 (Assistants Setup) **Status:** COMPLETED ### 6.1 P0 Implementation - [x] `executor/inspiration.go` - `RunInspiration(ctx, exec, data)` - real implementation - [x] `executor/inspiration.go` - build prompt using `InputFormatter.FormatClockContext()` - [x] `executor/inspiration.go` - call Inspiration Agent using `AgentCaller` - [x] `executor/inspiration.go` - parse response to `InspirationReport` (markdown content) - [x] `types/robot.go` - added `GetRobot()`/`SetRobot()` methods for Execution - [x] `executor/executor.go` - set robot reference on execution creation ### 6.2 Tests - [x] `executor/inspiration_test.go` - P0 with real LLM call (8 test cases) - [x] Test: clock context correctly formatted in prompt - [x] Test: robot identity included in prompt - [x] Test: markdown report generated with expected sections - [x] Test: handles LLM errors gracefully (robot nil, agent not found) - [x] Test: uses clock from trigger input or creates new one - [x] `InputFormatter.FormatClockContext()` unit tests (4 test cases) ### 6.3 Notes - `executor_test.go` temporarily moved to `.bak` - will restore when all phases implemented - P0 uses `robot.inspiration` test agent from `yao-dev-app/assistants/robot/inspiration/` --- ## Phase 7: P1 Goals Implementation ✅ **Goal:** Implement P1 (Goal Generation Agent). P0 → P1 → stub P2-P5. **Depends on:** Phase 6 (P0 Inspiration) **Status:** COMPLETED ### 7.1 P1 Implementation - [x] `executor/goals.go` - `RunGoals(ctx, exec, data)` - real implementation - [x] `executor/goals.go` - build prompt with inspiration report (Clock trigger) - [x] `executor/goals.go` - build prompt with trigger input (Human/Event trigger) - [x] `executor/goals.go` - call Goals Agent using `AgentCaller` - [x] `executor/goals.go` - parse response to `Goals` struct (JSON with content + delivery) - [x] `executor/goals.go` - handle Human/Event trigger (skip P0, use input directly) - [x] `executor/goals.go` - include robot identity in prompt - [x] `executor/goals.go` - include available resources in prompt - [x] `executor/goals.go` - `ParseDelivery()` - parse delivery target from JSON - [x] `executor/goals.go` - `IsValidDeliveryType()` - validate delivery types ### 7.2 Tests - [x] `executor/goals_test.go` - P1 with real LLM call (14 test cases) - [x] Test: inspiration report in prompt (Clock trigger) - [x] Test: user input in prompt (Human trigger) - [x] Test: event data in prompt (Event trigger) - [x] Test: goals markdown generated with priorities - [x] Test: delivery parsing from agent response - [x] Test: error handling (robot nil, agent not found, empty input) - [x] Test: fallback behavior (no inspiration → clock context) - [x] `ParseDelivery()` unit tests (8 test cases covering edge cases) - [x] `IsValidDeliveryType()` unit tests ### 7.3 Notes - P1 uses `robot.goals` test agent from `yao-dev-app/assistants/robot/goals/` - Goals Agent returns JSON: `{ "content": "...", "delivery": {...} }` - Delivery is optional; if not present or invalid, `Goals.Delivery` is nil - Available resources (agents, MCP, KB, DB) are passed to agent for achievable goal generation --- ## Phase 8: P2 Tasks Implementation ✅ **Goal:** Implement P2 (Task Planning Agent). P1 → P2 → stub P3-P5. **Depends on:** Phase 7 (P1 Goals) **Status:** COMPLETED ### 8.1 Validation Agent Setup (Prerequisite for P3) ✅ > **Note:** Validation Agent was already set up in Phase 5. - [x] `robot/validation/package.yao` - Validation Agent config (DeepSeek V3, temperature 0.2) - [x] `robot/validation/prompts.yml` - validation prompts - Input: Task result, expected outcome, validation rules - Output: Validation result (pass/fail, score, issues, suggestions) ### 8.2 P2 Implementation ✅ - [x] `executor/tasks.go` - `RunTasks(ctx, exec, data)` - real implementation - [x] `executor/tasks.go` - build prompt with goals (using `FormatGoals`) - [x] `executor/tasks.go` - include available tools/agents in prompt - [x] `executor/tasks.go` - include delivery target in prompt (for task output format) - [x] `executor/tasks.go` - call Tasks Agent using `AgentCaller` - [x] `executor/tasks.go` - parse response to `[]Task` (structured JSON) - [x] `executor/tasks.go` - validate task structure (executor type, ID, messages) - [x] `executor/tasks.go` - `ParseTasks()`, `ParseTask()`, `ParseMessages()` helpers - [x] `executor/tasks.go` - `SortTasksByOrder()` - ensure correct execution sequence - [x] `executor/tasks.go` - `ValidateExecutorExists()` - optional executor existence check - [x] `executor/tasks.go` - `ValidateTasksWithResources()` - validation with warnings - [x] `executor/input.go` - `FormatGoals()` updated to include Delivery Target ### 8.3 Tests ✅ - [x] `executor/tasks_test.go` - P2 with real LLM call (7 integration tests) - [x] Test: goals included in prompt - [x] Test: available tools listed in prompt - [x] Test: delivery target included in prompt - [x] Test: structured tasks generated - [x] Test: each task has valid executor type and ID - [x] Test: each task has expected output and validation rules - [x] `ParseTasks` unit tests (5 tests) - [x] `ValidateTasks` unit tests (5 tests) - [x] `SortTasksByOrder` unit tests (4 tests) - [x] `ValidateExecutorExists` unit tests (7 tests) - [x] `ValidateTasksWithResources` unit tests (3 tests) - [x] `ParseExecutorType` unit tests (5 tests) - [x] `IsValidExecutorType` unit tests (2 tests) - [x] `FormatGoals` with delivery target tests (4 tests) ### 8.4 Notes - Tasks Agent returns JSON: `{ "tasks": [...] }` - Each task includes: id, executor_type, executor_id, messages, expected_output, validation_rules, order - Tasks are sorted by `order` field after parsing - Executor existence is optionally validated (warnings only, doesn't block) - Delivery target from P1 is passed to P2 so tasks can produce appropriate output format --- ## Phase 9: P3 Run Implementation **Goal:** Implement P3 (Task Execution + Validation). P2 → P3 → stub P4-P5. **Depends on:** Phase 8 (P2 Tasks + Validation Agent) ### 9.1 Implementation - [ ] `executor/run.go` - `RunExecution(ctx, exec, data)` - real implementation - [ ] `executor/run.go` - iterate tasks in order - [ ] `executor/run.go` - dispatch to correct executor (assistant/mcp/process) - [ ] `executor/run.go` - collect results with timing - [ ] `executor/run.go` - call Validation Agent for each task result - [ ] `executor/run.go` - handle task failures gracefully (continue or abort based on config) - [ ] `executor/run.go` - support pause/resume during execution ### 9.2 Tests - [ ] `executor/run_test.go` - P3 with real agent calls - [ ] Test: tasks executed in order - [ ] Test: results collected with correct structure - [ ] Test: validation called for each task - [ ] Test: task failure doesn't stop entire execution (configurable) - [ ] Test: pause/resume works during task execution --- ## Phase 10: P4 Delivery Implementation **Goal:** Implement P4 (Delivery). P3 → P4 → stub P5. **Depends on:** Phase 9 (P3 Run) ### 10.1 Delivery Agent Setup - [ ] `robot/delivery/package.yao` - Delivery Agent config - [ ] `robot/delivery/prompts.yml` - delivery prompts ### 10.2 Implementation - [ ] `executor/delivery.go` - `RunDelivery(ctx, exec, data)` - real implementation - [ ] `executor/delivery.go` - build delivery content from results - [ ] `executor/delivery.go` - support email delivery - [ ] `executor/delivery.go` - support file delivery - [ ] `executor/delivery.go` - support webhook delivery - [ ] `executor/delivery.go` - support notify delivery ### 10.3 Tests - [ ] `executor/delivery_test.go` - P4 delivery - [ ] Test: delivery content generated correctly - [ ] Test: email delivery (mock or real) - [ ] Test: file delivery to configured path --- ## Phase 11: P5 Learning Implementation **Goal:** Implement P5 (Learning). Full execution flow complete. **Depends on:** Phase 10 (P4 Delivery) ### 11.1 Learning Agent Setup - [ ] `robot/learning/package.yao` - Learning Agent config - [ ] `robot/learning/prompts.yml` - learning prompts ### 11.2 Store Implementation - [ ] `store/store.go` - Store interface and struct - [ ] `store/kb.go` - KB operations (create, save, search) - [ ] `store/learning.go` - save learning entries to private KB ### 11.3 Implementation - [ ] `executor/learning.go` - `RunLearning(ctx, exec, data)` - real implementation - [ ] `executor/learning.go` - extract learnings from execution - [ ] `executor/learning.go` - call Learning Agent - [ ] `executor/learning.go` - save to private KB ### 11.4 Tests - [ ] `executor/learning_test.go` - P5 learning - [ ] Test: learnings extracted from execution - [ ] Test: learnings saved to KB - [ ] Test: KB can be queried for past learnings --- ## Phase 12: API & Integration **Goal:** Complete API implementation, end-to-end tests. ### 12.1 API Implementation - [ ] `api/api.go` - implement all Go API functions - [ ] `api/process.go` - implement all Process handlers - [ ] `api/jsapi.go` - implement JSAPI ### 12.2 End-to-End Tests - [ ] Full clock trigger flow (P0 → P5) - [ ] Human intervention flow (P1 → P5) - [ ] Event trigger flow (P1 → P5) - [ ] Concurrent execution test - [ ] Pause/Resume/Stop test ### 12.3 Integration with OpenAPI - [ ] HTTP endpoints for human intervention - [ ] Webhook endpoints for events --- ## Phase 13: Advanced Features **Goal:** Implement dedup, semantic dedup, plan queue. ### 13.1 Fast Dedup (Time-Window) > **Note:** Manager has `// TODO: dedup check` comment placeholder. Integrate after implementation. - [ ] `dedup/dedup.go` - Dedup struct - [ ] `dedup/fast.go` - fast in-memory time-window dedup - [ ] Key: `memberID:triggerType:window` - [ ] Check before submit - [ ] Mark after submit - [ ] Integrate into Manager.Tick() - [ ] Test: dedup check/mark, window expiry ### 13.2 Semantic Dedup - [ ] `dedup/semantic.go` - call Dedup Agent for goal/task level dedup - [ ] Dedup Agent setup (`assistants/robot/dedup/`) - [ ] Test: semantic dedup with real LLM ### 13.3 Plan Queue - [ ] `plan/plan.go` - plan queue implementation - [ ] Store planned tasks/goals - [ ] Execute at next cycle or specified time - [ ] `plan/schedule.go` - schedule for later - [ ] Test: plan queue operations > **Note:** Monitoring is provided by Job system (Activity Monitor UI). No separate implementation needed. --- ## Test Assistants Structure ``` yao-dev-app/assistants/robot/ ├── inspiration/ # P0: Inspiration Agent │ ├── package.yao │ └── prompts.yml ├── goals/ # P1: Goal Generation Agent │ ├── package.yao │ └── prompts.yml ├── tasks/ # P2: Task Planning Agent │ ├── package.yao │ └── prompts.yml ├── validation/ # P3: Validation Agent │ ├── package.yao │ └── prompts.yml ├── delivery/ # P4: Delivery Agent │ ├── package.yao │ └── prompts.yml ├── learning/ # P5: Learning Agent │ ├── package.yao │ └── prompts.yml └── dedup/ # Deduplication Agent ├── package.yao └── prompts.yml ``` --- ## Notes ### Test Environment Setup 1. **Environment Variables:** Run `source yao/env.local.sh` before tests 2. **Test Preparation:** Use `testutils.Prepare(t)` to load config, KB, and agents ```go package robot_test import ( "testing" "github.com/yaoapp/yao/agent/testutils" ) func TestExample(t *testing.T) { // Load environment config (from YAO_TEST_APPLICATION) // This loads: config, connectors, KB, agents, models, etc. testutils.Prepare(t) defer testutils.Clean(t) // Your test code here } ``` ### Test Conventions 1. **Black-box Tests:** All tests in `*_test` package (external package) 2. **Real LLM Calls:** Use `gpt-4o` or `deepseek` connectors for agent tests 3. **Incremental:** Each phase builds on previous, all tests must pass before next phase 4. **No Skip:** Do NOT use `t.Skip()` except for `testing.Short()` (CI mode) 5. **Must Assert:** Every test MUST have result validation assertions ```go func TestWithLLM(t *testing.T) { // Only allowed Skip: testing.Short() for CI if testing.Short() { t.Skip("Skipping integration test") } testutils.Prepare(t) defer testutils.Clean(t) // Your test code... result, err := SomeFunction() // MUST have assertions - no empty tests! assert.NoError(t, err) assert.NotNil(t, result) assert.Equal(t, expected, result.Field) } ``` ### Test Rules | Rule | Description | | ----------------- | ----------------------------------------- | | No arbitrary Skip | Only `testing.Short()` skip allowed | | Must assert | Every test must validate results | | No empty tests | Tests without assertions will fail review | | Real calls | LLM tests use real API calls, not mocks | ### Key Environment Variables | Variable | Description | | ---------------------- | ------------------------------- | | `YAO_TEST_APPLICATION` | Test app path (`yao-dev-app`) | | `OPENAI_TEST_KEY` | OpenAI API key | | `DEEPSEEK_API_KEY` | DeepSeek API key | | `YAO_DB_DRIVER` | Database driver (mysql/sqlite3) | | `YAO_DB_PRIMARY` | Database connection string | --- ## Progress Tracking | Phase | Status | Description | | --------------------- | ------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | 1. Types & Interfaces | ✅ | All types, enums, interfaces | | 2. Skeleton | ✅ | Empty stubs, code compiles | | 3. Scheduling System | ✅ | Cache + Pool + Trigger + Job + Executor architecture | | 4. Agent Infra | ✅ | AgentCaller, InputFormatter, test assistants | | 5. Test Scenarios | ✅ | Phase agents (P0-P5), expert agents | | 6. P0 Inspiration | ✅ | Inspiration Agent integration | | 7. P1 Goals | ✅ | Goal Generation Agent integration | | 8. P2 Tasks | ✅ | Task Planning Agent integration | | 9. P3 Run | ⬜ | Task execution (assistant/mcp/process) | | 10. P4 Delivery | ⬜ | Output delivery (email/file/webhook/notify) | | 11. P5 Learning | ⬜ | Learning Agent + KB save | | 12. API & Integration | ⬜ | Complete API, end-to-end tests | | 13. Advanced | ⬜ | Semantic dedup, plan queue, Sandbox mode (requires container infrastructure) | Legend: ⬜ Not started | 🟡 In progress | ✅ Complete --- ## Quick Commands ```bash # Setup environment source yao/env.local.sh # Run all robot tests go test -v ./agent/robot/... # Run specific phase tests go test -v ./agent/robot/types/... go test -v ./agent/robot/cache/... go test -v ./agent/robot/pool/... go test -v ./agent/robot/executor/... # Run with coverage go test -cover ./agent/robot/... ```