- Further streamlined the LoadWithRoot function by removing redundant checks and improving the overall readability of the path resolution logic. - Ensured consistent resolution of the absolute path for the configuration root, enhancing maintainability and clarity in the codebase.
34 KiB
Agent Test Framework V2 Design
Overview
This document describes the design for Agent Test Framework V2, which extends the existing testing capabilities with:
- Multi-turn conversations - Test agents across multiple interaction rounds
- Agent-driven testing - Use agents to generate test cases and simulate user responses
- Interactive testing - Human-in-the-loop testing mode
Problem Statement
Current single-turn testing cannot adequately test:
- Conversational flows - Agents that guide users through multi-step processes
- Confirmation dialogs - Agents that ask for user confirmation before actions
- Clarification requests - Agents that ask follow-up questions when input is ambiguous
- Stateful interactions - Agents that maintain context across multiple turns
Design Goals
- Unified format - Single test case format that supports all modes
- Flexible execution - Static, dynamic (simulator), and interactive modes
- Graceful degradation - Skip tests when required input is unavailable
- CI/CD compatible - Non-interactive mode for automated pipelines
- Agent-driven - Both input generation and user simulation can be agent-powered
Architecture Overview
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ yao agent test │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │
│ INPUT SOURCES (-i flag) │
│ ┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐ │
│ │ JSONL File │ │ Message │ │ Generator │ │ Interactive │ │
│ │ ./test.jsonl│ │ "Hello..." │ │ agent:xxx │ │ (stdin) │ │
│ └──────┬──────┘ └──────┬──────┘ └──────┬──────┘ └──────┬──────┘ │
│ │ │ │ │ │
│ └────────────────┴────────────────┴────────────────┘ │
│ │ │
│ ▼ │
│ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ Test Case Parser │ │
│ │ - Single-turn: {input, assertions} │ │
│ │ - Multi-turn: {turns: [{input, assertions}, ...]} │ │
│ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
│ │ │
│ ▼ │
│ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ Multi-Turn Executor │ │
│ │ │ │
│ │ ┌─────────┐ ┌─────────────────┐ ┌─────────────────┐ │ │
│ │ │ Turn │───▶│ Target Agent │───▶│ Response │ │ │
│ │ │ Input │ │ (being tested) │ │ + State │ │ │
│ │ └─────────┘ └─────────────────┘ └────────┬────────┘ │ │
│ │ ▲ │ │ │
│ │ │ ▼ │ │
│ │ │ ┌─────────────────────────────────────┐ │ │
│ │ │ │ Awaiting Input Detection │ │ │
│ │ │ │ - Explicit declaration │ │ │
│ │ │ │ - Tool-based detection │ │ │
│ │ │ │ - Content heuristics │ │ │
│ │ │ └──────────────┬──────────────────────┘ │ │
│ │ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ ┌─────────┴─────────┐ │ │
│ │ │ ▼ ▼ │ │
│ │ │ Awaiting=YES Awaiting=NO │ │
│ │ │ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ ▼ ▼ │ │
│ │ NEXT INPUT ┌─────────┐ ┌─────────┐ │ │
│ │ SOURCES: │ Get Next│ │Complete │ │ │
│ │ │ Input │ │ Test │ │ │
│ │ ┌──────────┐ └────┬────┘ └─────────┘ │ │
│ │ │ Static │◀───────┤ │ │
│ │ │ turns[] │ │ │ │
│ │ └──────────┘ │ │ │
│ │ ┌──────────┐ │ │ │
│ │ │Simulator │◀───────┤ │ │
│ │ │ Agent │ │ │ │
│ │ └──────────┘ │ │ │
│ │ ┌──────────┐ │ │ │
│ │ │ Human │◀───────┤ │ │
│ │ │ Input │ │ │ │
│ │ └──────────┘ │ │ │
│ │ ┌──────────┐ │ │ │
│ │ │ SKIP │◀───────┘ │ │
│ │ │ (no src) │ │ │
│ │ └──────────┘ │ │
│ │ │ │
│ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
│ │ │
│ ▼ │
│ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ Assertions │ │
│ │ - Per-turn assertions │ │
│ │ - Final assertions │ │
│ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
│ │ │
│ ▼ │
│ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ Reporter │ │
│ │ - Console output │ │
│ │ - JSONL output │ │
│ │ - Custom reporter agent │ │
│ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
│ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Core Challenge: Detecting "Awaiting Input" State
The key challenge is determining when an agent is waiting for user input vs. when it has completed its task.
Detection Strategies
Strategy 1: Explicit Declaration (Recommended)
Agent explicitly declares its state in the response:
{
"content": "What is the expense amount?",
"awaiting_input": true,
"input_hint": "Enter amount, e.g., $3500"
}
Strategy 2: Finish Reason Analysis
Use the LLM's finish_reason to determine state:
stop- Agent completed normally (may or may not need input)tool_calls- Agent is executing tools (not awaiting input)length- Response truncated (not awaiting input)
Strategy 3: Content Heuristics
Analyze response content for question patterns:
func looksLikeQuestion(content string) bool {
patterns := []string{
`\?$`, // Ends with question mark
`(?i)^(what|how|when|where|which|who|please|could you)`,
`(?i)(confirm|verify|proceed|continue)\?`,
}
for _, pattern := range patterns {
if regexp.MustCompile(pattern).MatchString(content) {
return true
}
}
return false
}
Strategy 4: Tool-Based Detection
Certain tools indicate awaiting input:
func toolRequiresInput(toolCall ToolCall) bool {
confirmationTools := []string{
"request_confirmation",
"ask_user",
"get_user_input",
}
return contains(confirmationTools, toolCall.Name)
}
Recommended Approach: Hybrid Detection
Combine multiple strategies with priority:
func IsAwaitingInput(result *TurnResult) (awaiting bool, reason string) {
// Priority 1: Explicit declaration
if result.AwaitingInput {
return true, "agent_declared"
}
// Priority 2: Tool-based detection
for _, tc := range result.ToolCalls {
if toolRequiresInput(tc) {
return true, "tool_requires_confirmation"
}
}
// Priority 3: Content heuristics
if looksLikeQuestion(result.Content) {
return true, "content_is_question"
}
return false, "completed"
}
Test Case Format
Single-Turn (Existing)
{
"id": "T001",
"input": "Hello",
"assertions": [
{
"type": "contains",
"value": "Hi"
}
]
}
Multi-Turn (New)
{
"id": "T001",
"name": "Expense Reimbursement Flow",
"type": "multi_turn",
"turns": [
{
"input": "I want to submit an expense report",
"assertions": [
{
"type": "contains",
"value": "type of expense"
}
]
},
{
"input": "Business travel to Beijing, flight $2000, hotel $1500",
"assertions": [
{
"type": "tool_called",
"name": "create_expense"
}
]
},
{
"input": "Yes, confirm",
"assertions": [
{
"type": "contains",
"value": "submitted"
}
]
}
],
"simulator": {
"use": "agents:workers.test.user-simulator",
"persona": "New employee unfamiliar with expense process",
"goal": "Submit a $3500 travel expense",
"max_turns": 10
},
"interactive": {
"enabled": false,
"timeout": "5m"
},
"on_missing_input": "skip",
"final_assertions": [
{
"type": "json_path",
"path": "$.expense.status",
"value": "submitted"
}
]
}
Field Descriptions
| Field | Type | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
id |
string | Yes | Unique test identifier |
name |
string | No | Human-readable test name |
type |
string | No | "single_turn" (default) or "multi_turn" |
turns |
array | No | Static turn definitions |
turns[].input |
string | Yes | User input for this turn |
turns[].assertions |
array | No | Assertions for this turn's response |
simulator |
object | No | Dynamic input generator configuration |
simulator.use |
string | Yes | Simulator reference: agents:id or scripts:id |
simulator.persona |
string | No | User persona description |
simulator.goal |
string | No | What the simulated user wants to achieve |
simulator.max_turns |
int | No | Maximum turns before timeout (default: 20) |
interactive |
object | No | Interactive mode configuration |
interactive.enabled |
bool | No | Enable human input (default: false) |
interactive.timeout |
string | No | Timeout for human input (default: "5m") |
on_missing_input |
string | No | "skip", "fail", or "end" (default: "skip") |
final_assertions |
array | No | Assertions after conversation completes |
Execution Modes
Mode 1: Static Turns
Uses predefined turns array. Best for deterministic flows.
Turn 1: Send turns[0].input → Assert turns[0].assertions
Turn 2: Send turns[1].input → Assert turns[1].assertions
...
Mode 2: Dynamic Simulator
Uses an agent to simulate user responses. Best for complex/variable flows.
Turn 1: Send initial input → Get response
Turn 2: Simulator generates input based on response → Get response
...
Until: Goal achieved OR max_turns reached
Mode 3: Interactive
Prompts human for input when agent awaits. Best for debugging/exploration.
Turn 1: Send input → Get response
Turn 2: [Agent awaiting] → Prompt human → Get response
...
Mode 4: Skip (Default Fallback)
When agent awaits input but no source available, skip with explanation.
Mode Priority
When multiple input sources are configured, they are used in this order:
- Static turns - If
turns[n+1]exists, use it - Simulator - If no more static turns but simulator configured, use it
- Interactive - If
--interactiveflag and no simulator, prompt human - Skip/Fail/End - Based on
on_missing_inputsetting
This allows hybrid testing: define some turns statically, then let simulator handle the rest.
{
"turns": [
{
"input": "Start expense report"
},
{
"input": "Travel expense, $500"
}
],
"simulator": {
"use": "agents:workers.test.user-sim",
"goal": "Complete the expense submission"
}
}
In this example:
- Turn 1-2: Use static inputs
- Turn 3+: Simulator generates inputs until goal achieved
Execution Flow
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Multi-Turn Test Execution │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │
│ START: Get initial input │
│ ├─ From turns[0].input if defined │
│ └─ From test.input (single-turn compat) │
│ ↓ │
│ LOOP: │
│ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ 1. Send input to Agent │ │
│ │ ↓ │ │
│ │ 2. Get Agent response │ │
│ │ ↓ │ │
│ │ 3. Execute turn assertions (if defined) │ │
│ │ ↓ │ │
│ │ 4. Check: Is Agent awaiting input? │ │
│ │ │ │ │
│ │ ├─ NO → Exit loop (conversation complete) │ │
│ │ │ │ │
│ │ └─ YES → Get next input: │ │
│ │ │ │ │
│ │ ├─ turns[n+1] exists? │ │
│ │ │ → Use static input │ │
│ │ │ │ │
│ │ ├─ simulator configured? │ │
│ │ │ → Call simulator agent │ │
│ │ │ │ │
│ │ ├─ interactive enabled? │ │
│ │ │ → Prompt for human input │ │
│ │ │ │ │
│ │ └─ None available? │ │
│ │ → Handle per on_missing_input: │ │
│ │ skip: SKIP test │ │
│ │ fail: FAIL test │ │
│ │ end: Exit loop normally │ │
│ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
│ ↓ │
│ END: Execute final_assertions │
│ Report result │
│ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Command Line Interface
Flags Reference
| Flag | Long | Description |
|---|---|---|
-i |
--input |
Input source: file path, message, or type:id reference |
-n |
--name |
Target agent ID (the agent being tested) |
-o |
--output |
Output file path for results |
-c |
--connector |
Override connector for the target agent |
-v |
--verbose |
Verbose output showing all turns |
--interactive |
Enable human input when agent awaits | |
--simulator |
Default simulator: agents:id or scripts:id |
|
--timeout |
Timeout per test case (default: 5m) | |
--parallel |
Number of parallel test cases | |
--fail-fast |
Stop on first failure | |
--dry-run |
Generate/parse tests without running |
Input Sources (-i flag)
The -i flag supports multiple input sources with unified type:id format:
# 1. File path (default, no prefix needed)
yao agent test -i ./tests/multi-turn.jsonl
# 2. Direct message (no prefix, auto-detected as non-file)
yao agent test -i "Hello, how are you?" -n assistants.chat
# 3. Agent-generated test cases
yao agent test -i agents:workers.test.generator -n assistants.expense
# 4. Script-generated test cases
yao agent test -i scripts:tests.generate -n assistants.expense
# 5. With parameters (query string style)
yao agent test -i "agents:workers.test.generator?count=10&focus=edge-cases" -n assistants.expense
Input Type Prefixes
| Prefix | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
| (none) | File path or direct message | ./tests.jsonl, "Hello" |
agents: |
Agent generates test cases | agents:workers.test.gen |
scripts: |
Script generates test cases | scripts:tests.generate |
Input Format
[prefix:]<id>[?param1=value1¶m2=value2]
prefix- Input type:agents:orscripts:(optional, default is file/message)id- Agent ID or script ID?params- Query parameters passed to generator
Generator Agent Interface
// Input to generator agent
interface GeneratorInput {
target_agent: string; // Agent being tested (from -n flag)
target_description?: string; // Agent's description/purpose
target_tools?: Tool[]; // Agent's available tools
count?: number; // Number of test cases to generate
focus?: string; // Focus area: "happy-path", "edge-cases", "errors"
complexity?: string; // "simple", "medium", "complex"
}
// Output from generator agent
interface GeneratorOutput {
cases: TestCase[]; // Generated test cases
}
Example Generator Prompt
You are a test case generator for AI agents.
Target Agent: {{target_agent}}
Description: {{target_description}}
Available Tools: {{target_tools}}
Generate {{count}} test cases with focus on: {{focus}}
For each test case, provide:
- id: Unique identifier
- name: Descriptive name
- input: User message or turns array for multi-turn
- assertions: Expected behaviors to verify
Output as JSON array of test cases.
Complete Examples
# Basic: Run tests from file
yao agent test -i ./tests/expense.jsonl
# With target agent specified (required for message/agent input)
yao agent test -i "Help me file an expense" -n assistants.expense
# Agent generates tests, then runs them
yao agent test \
-i "agents:workers.test.generator?count=20&focus=edge-cases" \
-n assistants.expense
# Script generates tests
yao agent test \
-i "scripts:tests.expense.generate?scenario=approval-flow" \
-n assistants.expense
# Fully dynamic: Agent generates tests + Agent simulates user responses
yao agent test \
-i "agents:workers.test.generator?count=10" \
-n assistants.expense \
--simulator agents:workers.test.user-simulator
# Generate tests only, save to file (dry-run)
yao agent test \
-i "agents:workers.test.generator?count=50" \
-n assistants.expense \
-o ./tests/generated.jsonl \
--dry-run
# Interactive mode: human provides input when agent awaits
yao agent test -i ./tests/multi-turn.jsonl --interactive
# CI/CD mode: skip tests requiring human input
yao agent test -i ./tests/multi-turn.jsonl --skip-interactive
# Fail instead of skip when input unavailable
yao agent test -i ./tests/multi-turn.jsonl --on-missing-input=fail
# Verbose output showing all turns
yao agent test -i ./tests/multi-turn.jsonl -v
Output Format
Console Output
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
Agent Test (Multi-Turn)
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
ℹ Agent: assistants.expense
ℹ Input: ./tests/expense-flow.jsonl (5 test cases)
───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Running Tests
───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
► [T001] Expense Reimbursement Flow (3 turns)
├─ Turn 1: "I want to submit an expense" → PASSED (2.1s)
│ Agent: "What type of expense would you like to submit?"
│ ✓ contains "type of expense"
│
├─ Turn 2: "Business travel, $3500" → PASSED (3.2s)
│ Agent: [tool: create_expense({amount: 3500, type: "travel"})]
│ ✓ tool_called "create_expense"
│
├─ Turn 3: "Yes, confirm" → PASSED (1.8s)
│ Agent: "Expense submitted. Reference: EXP-2025-001"
│ ✓ contains "submitted"
│
└─ Final Assertions: PASSED
✓ $.expense.status = "submitted"
► [T002] Large Expense Approval
├─ Turn 1: "Submit $100,000 equipment purchase" → PASSED (2.0s)
│ Agent: "This requires manager approval. Please provide PO number."
│
├─ Turn 2: SKIPPED
│ Reason: Agent awaiting input, no next turn defined
│ Agent asked: "Please provide PO number"
│ Hint: Add more turns, use --interactive, or configure simulator
│
└─ Result: SKIPPED
► [T003] Dynamic Expense Flow (simulator: workers.test.user-sim)
├─ Turn 1: [Initial] "Help me file an expense" → PASSED (2.1s)
├─ Turn 2: [Simulated] "It's for client dinner, $250" → PASSED (2.8s)
├─ Turn 3: [Simulated] "Yesterday evening" → PASSED (2.2s)
├─ Turn 4: [Simulated] "Confirm" → PASSED (1.9s)
│ Goal achieved: Expense submitted
│
└─ Final Assertions: PASSED
───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Summary
───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Total: 3 tests
Passed: 2
Failed: 0
Skipped: 1
Total turns: 10
Avg turns/test: 3.3
Total time: 18.1s
JSONL Output
{
"id": "T001",
"name": "Expense Reimbursement Flow",
"status": "passed",
"turns": [
{
"turn": 1,
"input": "I want to submit an expense",
"input_source": "static",
"output": "What type of expense would you like to submit?",
"awaiting_input": true,
"assertions": [
{
"type": "contains",
"value": "type of expense",
"passed": true
}
],
"duration_ms": 2100
},
{
"turn": 2,
"input": "Business travel, $3500",
"input_source": "static",
"output": "",
"tool_calls": [
{
"name": "create_expense",
"args": {
"amount": 3500
}
}
],
"awaiting_input": true,
"assertions": [
{
"type": "tool_called",
"name": "create_expense",
"passed": true
}
],
"duration_ms": 3200
},
{
"turn": 3,
"input": "Yes, confirm",
"input_source": "static",
"output": "Expense submitted. Reference: EXP-2025-001",
"awaiting_input": false,
"assertions": [
{
"type": "contains",
"value": "submitted",
"passed": true
}
],
"duration_ms": 1800
}
],
"final_assertions": [
{
"type": "json_path",
"path": "$.expense.status",
"value": "submitted",
"passed": true
}
],
"total_turns": 3,
"duration_ms": 7100
}
User Simulator Agent
Interface
The simulator agent receives conversation context and generates the next user input:
// Input to simulator
interface SimulatorInput {
persona: string; // User persona description
goal: string; // What user wants to achieve
conversation: Message[]; // Conversation history
last_response: string; // Agent's last response
turn_number: number; // Current turn (1-based)
max_turns: number; // Maximum allowed turns
}
// Output from simulator
interface SimulatorOutput {
input: string; // Generated user input
goal_achieved: boolean; // Whether goal is complete
reasoning?: string; // Why this input was chosen
}
Example Simulator Prompt
You are simulating a user with the following characteristics:
Persona: {{persona}}
Goal: {{goal}}
Current conversation:
{{conversation}}
The agent just responded:
"{{last_response}}"
Generate the next user message to continue toward the goal.
If the goal has been achieved, set goal_achieved to true.
Respond in JSON format:
{
"input": "your response as the user",
"goal_achieved": true/false,
"reasoning": "brief explanation"
}
Backward Compatibility
Existing single-turn tests continue to work unchanged:
// This still works
{"id": "T001", "input": "Hello", "assertions": [...]}
// Equivalent to
{"id": "T001", "type": "single_turn", "turns": [{"input": "Hello", "assertions": [...]}]}
Error Handling
Turn-Level Errors
| Error Type | Behavior | Output |
|---|---|---|
| Agent timeout | Mark turn as FAILED | error: "timeout after 30s" |
| Agent error | Mark turn as FAILED | error: "agent error: ..." |
| Assertion failed | Mark turn as FAILED | assertion_errors: [...] |
| Simulator error | Mark turn as SKIPPED | skip_reason: "simulator error" |
Test-Level Errors
| Error Type | Behavior | Output |
|---|---|---|
| No initial input | Mark test as FAILED | error: "no initial input" |
| Max turns exceeded | Mark test as FAILED | error: "max turns (20) exceeded" |
| All turns passed | Mark test as PASSED | status: "passed" |
| Any turn failed | Mark test as FAILED | status: "failed" |
| Skipped due to missing input | Mark test as SKIPPED | status: "skipped" |
Context and State
Conversation Context
Each multi-turn test maintains a conversation context:
type ConversationContext struct {
SessionID string // Unique session for this test
Messages []Message // Full conversation history
ToolResults map[string]any // Results from tool calls
Variables map[string]any // Custom variables set during test
TurnCount int // Current turn number
}
Context Passing to Simulator
The simulator receives full context to generate appropriate responses:
{
"persona": "New employee",
"goal": "Submit expense report",
"context": {
"session_id": "test-session-001",
"messages": [...],
"tool_results": {
"create_expense": {"id": "EXP-001", "status": "pending"}
},
"turn_count": 3
},
"last_response": "Please confirm the expense details..."
}
Attachments in Multi-Turn
Multi-turn tests support attachments at the turn level:
{
"id": "T001",
"name": "Receipt Upload Flow",
"turns": [
{
"input": "I want to submit an expense with receipt",
"attachments": [
{
"type": "image",
"source": "file://./tests/fixtures/receipt.jpg"
}
]
},
{
"input": "The amount is $150"
}
]
}
Open Questions
-
Session Management: How to handle session state across turns? Use existing session or create new per-test?
-
Timeout Strategy: Per-turn timeout vs. total test timeout?
-
Parallel Execution: Can multi-turn tests run in parallel, or must they be sequential?
-
Retry Logic: If a turn fails, retry just that turn or restart entire conversation?
-
Snapshot Testing: Should we support "golden file" comparison for conversation flows?